
justice Lateef Lawal-Akapo of a Lagos High Court sitting in Ikeja has fixed May 2 to rule on the application filed by the former Managing Director of the defunct Intercontinental Bank Plc, Dr. Erastus Akingbola, challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear the N47.1billion theft charge preferred against him.
Akingbola, through his counsel, Chief
Wole Olanipekun (SAN), in two preliminary notices of objection,
challenged the jurisdiction of the Lagos High Court to entertain the
theft charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC).
The anti-graft establishment charged the
former bank chief and his associate, Bayo Dada, with allegedly stealing
money belonging to the bank.
Dada also filed a similar application before the court.
At the resumed hearing yesterday,
Olanipekun, moving the application, argued that the subject matter of
the alleged offences related to banking operations and operations of
capital issues, which fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the
Federal High Court.
He based his submission on a judgment delivered by the Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal, on November 21 last year.
The appellate court in the judgment
struck out a theft charge preferred against a former Managing Director
of the defunct Finbank Plc, Mr. Okey Nwosu and others.
The Court of Appeal held in Nwosu’s case
that the Lagos High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the charge
because it emanated from capital market transactions.
It also held that a case associated with the capital market should be handled by a Federal High Court.
Olanipekun urged the court to be guided by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Nwosu matter and grant the application.
He submitted that the issue of jurisdiction is fundamental.
Olanipekun also cited another High Court
of Lagos judge, Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo, whose court adjourned
another matter involving Atuche on the same grounds indefinitely.
He said the state High Court should not
be made mere undertakers of matters, which the Federal High Courts have
exclusive jurisdiction over.
Counsel to EFCC, Chief Godwin Obla
(SAN), said contrary to the submissions of Olanipekun, the constitution
did not vex exclusive jurisdiction on the Federal High Court on criminal
matters.
He said Federal High Court and state High Court could hear criminal matters.
On Nwosu’s case cited by Olanipekun, the
EFCC lawyer argued that the Court of Appeal based its judgment on a
decision, which had been upturned by the Supreme Court.
He urged the court not to follow a
decision, which had been overtaken by events and rendered obsolete,
having been upturned by a superior court.
Obla enjoined the court to dismiss the applications of the defendants.
Justice Lawal-Akapo adjourned the matter till May 2 for ruling.
No comments:
Post a Comment