Thursday, 3 April 2014

Drug dealer bags 35-year jail term

NDLEA-Logo.jpg
The Kaduna State Command of National Drug Law Enforcement Agency on Thursday said it had secured the conviction of a drug dealer for a 35-year jail term.
The command, which said a Federal High Court in Kaduna gave the verdict also said 21 others, including a 68-year-old drug dealer were also convicted in March this year.
The Head of the Kaduna State command of the agency, Mr. Mohammed Jibrin, told the News Agency of Nigeria in Kaduna that Ojebou, had eluded arrest for many years.
“We got a landmark judgment on one notorious drug dealer, Davidson Ojebou, who was caught with 640kg of cannabis sativa. He was jailed for 35 years by the Federal High Court, Kaduna.
“It is a landmark judgment because the highest we expect you can get for life imprisonment is 25 years. But because of the antecedent of the suspect, he was given 35 years imprisonment.’’
Similarly, Jibrin said another notorious drug dealer in Samaru Zaria, Muntari Hassan, 68, was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.
He said Hassan had been caught several times and had served jail terms three times before his recent arrest and conviction.
“A notorious drug dealer in Zaria, Muntari Hassan, 68 years old, who has been to jail three times in the past for drug trafficking was re-arrested by us, for still dealing in cannabis in spite of the jail terms he had served in the past.
“As such we prosecuted him again and the judges took note of his unrepentant nature and sentenced him to 10 years imprisonment.’’
He also said that the agency had successfully prosecuted 20 other cases in Kaduna State.
He told NAN that the state government had inaugurated a joint task force, comprising all heads of security agencies under his chairmanship to complement the role of the NDLEA in the fight against drug abuse.
“The task force is to carry out operations to reduce the menace of hard drug abuse and trafficking in the state.
“As such it will carry out operations with the aim of arresting drug dealers, dismantling drug joints and seizing illicit drugs that are being rampantly abused and trafficked in the state. The task force was set up to complement the efforts of NDLEA.’’
According to him, no fewer than 50 people have been arrested in some black spots in the state while over 200 kg of cannabis and 73 kg of psychotropic substances were seized in March.
Jibrin further said that the agency, through the combined efforts of all security agencies, had arrested seven major cocaine dealers within the Kaduna metropolis.
He said the cocaine dealers, who were armed, were overpowered by the joint task force.
The NDLEA chief reiterated the commitment of the agency to combat the menace of drug addicts and dealers as part of the efforts to reduce crime rate in the state.

Akingbola: Court to decide on jurisdiction May 2

Akingbola: Court to decide on jurisdiction May 2
justice Lateef Lawal-Akapo of a Lagos High Court sitting in Ikeja has fixed May 2 to rule on the application filed by the former Managing Director of the defunct Intercontinental Bank Plc, Dr. Erastus Akingbola, challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear the N47.1billion theft charge preferred against him.
Akingbola, through his counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), in two preliminary notices of objection, challenged the jurisdiction of the Lagos High Court to entertain the theft charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The anti-graft establishment charged the former bank chief and his associate, Bayo Dada, with allegedly stealing money belonging to the bank.
Dada also filed a similar application before the court.
At the resumed hearing yesterday, Olanipekun, moving the application, argued that the subject matter of the alleged offences related to banking operations and operations of capital issues, which fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court.
He based his submission on a judgment delivered by the Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal, on November 21 last year.
The appellate court in the judgment struck out a theft charge preferred against a former Managing Director of the defunct Finbank Plc, Mr. Okey Nwosu and others.
The Court of Appeal held in Nwosu’s case that the Lagos High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the charge because it emanated from capital market transactions.
It also held that a case associated with the capital market should be handled by a Federal High Court.
Olanipekun urged the court to be guided by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Nwosu matter and grant the application.
He submitted that the issue of jurisdiction is fundamental.
Olanipekun also cited another High Court of Lagos judge, Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo, whose court adjourned another matter involving Atuche on the same grounds indefinitely.
He said the state High Court should not be made mere undertakers of matters, which the Federal High Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over.
Counsel to EFCC, Chief Godwin Obla (SAN), said contrary to the submissions of Olanipekun, the constitution did not vex exclusive jurisdiction on the Federal High Court on criminal matters.
He said Federal High Court and state High Court could hear criminal matters.
On Nwosu’s case cited by Olanipekun, the EFCC lawyer argued that the Court of Appeal based its judgment on a decision, which had been upturned by the Supreme Court.
He urged the court not to follow a decision, which had been overtaken by events and rendered obsolete, having been upturned by a superior court.
Obla enjoined the court to dismiss the applications of the defendants.
Justice Lawal-Akapo adjourned the matter till May 2 for ruling.

Anambra Poll Tribunal rejects video evidence

Anambra Poll Tribunal rejects video evidence
The Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Awka yesterday rejected the video evidence presented by African Independent Television (AIT) during the hearing of the petition filed by Senator Chris Ngige against INEC, Governor Willie Obiano and the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA).
 The AIT was summoned by the Tribunal via a subpoena dated March 6 to give evidence in the case.
But following the objection by Gboyega Awomolo (SAN) representing INEC, that the document could not be admitted in evidence because it had not satisfied Section 84 of the Evidence Act which deals with tendering of electronic evidence, it was not admitted by the Tribunal.
Mr Rotimi Akeredolu (SAN) for Ngige noted that the letter of authority from AIT together with the witness deposition contained in his evidence in chief had satisfied the provision of Section 84,  of the Evidence Act on materials produced with the aid of computers and yet has not contravened Section 258, Subsection 1A of the 2011 Evidence Act.
The Tribunal ruled to reject the video evidence and the AIT reporter, Mr. Vin Martin Ilo, registered as PW19 was discharged.
Another witness Bona Oraekwe identified 939 ‘Forms EC 17’ obtained from INEC  as having been used in the conduct of the elections. 86 Forms EC25A and 90 Forms EC25B,which were promptly admitted. Form EC 17 is the form documenting the oath taken by all INEC staff and adhoc staff involved in the elections, provided by law to be sworn to before engaging in any role in the elections. Form EC25A is the form documenting the receipt of electoral material in the state and local government areas, while ‘Forms EC 25B’ documents the receipt of materials by INEC staff in by INEC Presiding Officers in the Polling Units.
Ngige and his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) are contending in the petition that most of the forms were either written and sworn to on a date after the elections or back-dated, while others contain irregularities. The sitting continues today.
The Enugu Division of the Court of Appeal will today hear arguments in an interlocutory appeal brought before it by Senator Chris Ngige and the All Progressive Congress (APC), asking the appellate court to hold that the Anambra State Election petitions Tribunal sitting in Awka erred in law by failing to uphold the provision of Paragraph 12 Sub Paragraph 5 of the First Schedule of the Electoral Act in its ruling of February 18, 2014.
This is one of the three appeals to be argued today.
The others are seeking an order of the Appeal Court to restore the paragraphs of the petitioners election petition which were struck out by the Tribunal on February 28 as well as  the striking out, by the Tribunal, of some paragraphs of the petitioners reply to the Respondents answer on 5th March 2014.
The Election Tribunal had on February 19 refused in part, an application filed by Ngige and APC requesting that all preliminary objections in the petition should be documented and reserved till the final address. Rather the Tribunal accepted the application with respect to applications seeking to strike out the entire petition for lack of competence, but refused it for application seeking to strike out some paragraphs.
As at the ruling of February 19, there was no application seeking to strike out the entire petition of Ngige and APC,but there were applications  seeking to strike out some paragraphs.
Ngige is querying what he and APC interpreted as discrimination by the Tribunal between full striking out and partial striking out.
The appellants have requested the court to save and restore the paragraphs and order that hearing should be conducted by an impartial panel.
The paragraphs struck out on February 28 and March 5 border on Chief Wille Obiano’s double registration allegations against a notary public who was appointed by INEC to administer oath of neutrality on ad-hoc staff long after the elections, allegations against INEC which pertain to the voter register given on October 16 2013 and November 13, 2014, which the successful application at the Tribunal claimed were pre-election matters.

N20m fraud: Court dismisses ex-banker’s no-case submission


An Ikeja High Court on Thursday dismissed a no-case submission filed by a former banker, Olutola Ojo, charged with N20 million fraud.
Ruling on the application filed by Ojo’s counsel, Mr N.O. Olagunju, Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo held that the defendant had a case to answer.
He said the exhibits tendered by the prosecution and the testimonies of its six witnesses had adduced sufficient evidence to warrant the defendant to open his defence.
The judge consequently ordered Ojo to open the defence of his case on June 23.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Ojo was charged alongside his company — Forox Standard Concepts, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
He was facing a seven-count charge bordering on obtaining money by false pretences, issuance of a dishonoured cheque, forgery and uttering.
The EFCC’s counsel, Mr Ben Ubi, alleged that Ojo had committed the offences between January and June 2009, while he was a staff of the defunct Oceanic Bank Plc.
Ubi said he had obtained N20 million from one of the bank’s customers, Chief Samuel Anibata.
He said the money was obtained by the defendant under the pretext of helping Anibata to purchase Low Pour Fuel Oil for supply to Dangote Cement Factory in Obajana, Kogi State.
Ojo was also accused of forging various documents which he used to facilitate the fraud.
According to Ubi, the defendant also issued several banks’ cheques in various sums in favour of Anibata which were dishonoured by the banks due to insufficient funds in his account.
Ubi said the offences contravened sections 467 and 468 of the Criminal Code Laws of Lagos State, 2003.
He said it also contravened section 2(b) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act 2006 and section 1 (1) of the Dishonoured Cheques (Offences) Act.

I had sex with 10 men daily, teenager tells court I had sex with 10 men daily, teenager tells court


A 19-year-old girl (names withheld) Thursday narrated before a Federal High Court in Lagos how she was lured into prostitution in Burkina Faso.
She was working as a sales girl in Victoria Island before two middle-aged men told her they could help her find a better job abroad.
The men, Christian Awanebi and Ariwayo Olowede, who pleaded not guilty, allegedly took her to Burkina Faso sometime in 2011.
Led in evidence by Mrs Anthonia Mgbemeje of the National Agency for Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP), the girl said the men promised to help her get a job in a super store as a sales girl.
When she got to Burkina Faso, she was allegedly made to have sex with men so she could repay N200, 000, the men claimed to have spent on her travel expenses.
According to her, she had sex with over 10 men daily, charging an equivalent of N5,000 per person.
She said the men allegedly made her take a blood covenant, swearing not to tell anyone about her ordeal.
Mgbemeje said the accused persons committed the alleged offence sometime in November 2012 at Ilasan estate, Lekki, Lagos.
She said that the offence contravened section 15 (a) of NAPTIP Act 2003.
The accused persons used were arraigned March 27, last year.
Their lawyer, Mr Mac Johnson asked the court to adjourn the case for cross-examination of the girl.
Justice Saliu Saidu adjourned till April 10 for continuation of trial.

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

NBA Warri Petitions I-G over Killing of Two Members

2708F01.NBA-Logo.jpg - 2708F01.NBA-Logo.jpg
Warri Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police (I-G) over the gruesome killing last week of two lawyers at Ozoro, Isoko North Local Government Area of Delta State while on their way to the court.

The lawyers are demanding that justice be done in the case involving two of their defenceless, law-abiding colleagues, Messrs Horace Eguono Dafioghor and Samuel Ekuwangju who were shot dead en route to the High Court Ozoro for a ruling in the petition filed by the deceased.

The late lawyers, who were both from the Whytfort Jurisconsult Chambers located on Udu Road, Ovwian Town in Delta State, were initially simply said to be handling a certain "high-profile case" when they were gunned down in cold blood.

Details to follow

APC asks CJN to sanction judge

 
The All Progressives Congress on Tuesday asked the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Aloma Mukhtar, to sanction Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja  for engaging in mischief capable of bringing the  Bench into disrepute.
The party accused Ademola of going beyond “the reliefs” sought by the ruling  Peoples Democratic  Party  in its suit by restraining  its lawmakers  from engaging in any act that could lead to a change of leadership in  the House of Representatives.
It, however, said in a statement by its Interim National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, that  it was wrong for anyone  to insinuate that Ademola  ordered   its lawmakers who defected from the   Peoples Democratic Party to vacate their seats in the House.
According to the party,  the judge lacked the competence to  deliver such a verdict since the issue of whether or not the lawmakers  could  defect was not before him.
The  party  said it would  appeal the ruling  since Ademola’s perpetual injunction  was  not only unconstitutional, but also defeated  the very purpose for which the legislators were elected into the House.
“Justice Ademola’s unsolicited comments were clearly gregarious, unnecessary, and superfluous and have no foundation in law or fact, hence should be ignored,” it advised.
The statement partly reads,“APC asked the CJN  to act urgently to sanction Justice Ademola for engaging in mischief that could bring the Bench into disrepute.
“If this case had been issued a day later than Monday, we would have said the judge was caught in the web of April fool. Alas, he indeed made the ruling on Monday, hence the need for us to take it very seriously for several reasons.
“Firstly, the question whether the House of Representatives members should vacate their seats was not a question before Justice Ademola for determination.
“The only question for him to determine was whether the APC members, with their numerical strength at that time, had the right to change the House leadership such as the Majority Leader, Chief Whip and their deputies. So, Justice Ademola had no business commenting on seats being vacated.”
The APC also said it was  highly unprofessional and unethical for a judge to delve into a matter that  was  subjudice in another court.
It  stated that the question of seats being vacated or otherwise was  being heard by Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the same  Federal High Court in Abuja, who on  March 29,  2014, said the issue was still   before him and was  not ripe for judgment.
The APC recalled that it had on December  14, 2013 warned against any attempt by the PDP and the Presidency to turn back the hands of the clock as far as the cleaning up of the Judiciary  was concerned, by inducing a   disreputable judge to do its bidding.
The party urged its supporters not to panic as the judgment was clearly intended to cause mischief, adding that the plan by the PDP and the Presidency had  fallen like a pack of cards.
Also in Abuja, the Minority Whip of the House, Mr. Sampson Osagie, accused Ademola of taking sides with the PDP-led Federal Government in delivering the judgment.
Osagie, who led members of the APC caucus  to a news conference  shortly after the House rose on Tuesday, also accused the judge of    overstepping  his bounds by “injecting opinions” not sought in the originating suit .
He  recalled that all that the PDP sought in the case was to restrain the lawmakers from effecting a change in the leadership of the House.
He noted that the PDP had hinged the prayer on the fear that by APC’s growing numerical strength in the House, its  lawmakers  could change the leadership of the House.
The lawmaker  argued that the judge’s action had made Nigerians to give several interpretations to the verdict.
“The only import of the judgment is that the defected lawmakers  cannot participate in the removal of the leadership of the House. There is nothing more to it; the judge was not called to offer any other personal opinion,” Osagie added.
He said,  “Our colleagues have appealed the judgment, a copy of which has been served on the House.”
The  legislator described the development as an act of “desperation” by the PDP to cling on to power in the face of the opposition by the APC.
“What we are experiencing is the high-handedness of a ruling PDP government that is desperate to hang on to power”, he said.
He assured Nigerians that the APC would remain focused in the face of the alleged manipulation by the PDP to hold on to power.
The PDP caucus remained calm on Tuesday, contrary to expectations that its  members would raise the matter on the floor.
The session started and ended without a mention of the court judgment.
The only noticeable reaction on the floor was that the PDP members were seen jeering jokingly at some of the  defected  lawmakers, urging them to “return home.”
The APC members were heard responding, “no shaking”, “no going back”, “APC for life” and “forget the  PDP.”
However, The PUNCH gathered that the calmness in the PDP  camp was due to a few minutes meeting the members held preceding the sitting.
At the meeting, which was convened by the Majority Leader of the House, Mulikat Akande-Adeola, the caucus reportedly reviewed the  judgment and agreed to maintain calm until they had been served with a copy of the judgment.
“There is no point taking any hasty decisions without first being served a copy of the judgment officially,” a member of the caucus  told The PUNCH.
When contacted on why the caucus was silent on the judgment, the  Deputy Majority Leader, Mr. Leo Ogor, replied that further reactions would await the service of the judgment.
Ogor said, “We are waiting to be served a copy of the judgment.  We don’t have a copy for now served formally on us.”
Asked whether his position was the  outcome  of the meeting held before the sitting, he replied, “That is what I am telling you.  We have not been served with the copy of the judgment.”
Efforts made by our correspondents  to get the  PDP   spokesperson, Chief Olisa Metuh, to comment on the verdict were not successful.
Metuh, who was said to be attending a retreat in Bayelsa State, did not  pick his call.
He also  did not respond to a text message sent to his mobile telephone  line.

LAWYER OF THE WEEK : FUNKE ADEKOYA

 
Funke Adekoya, the managing partner at AELEX Legal Practitioners and Arbitrators is a seasoned legal practitioner.  In recognition of her track record of success in the legal sector, Adekoya was elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria in 2001, the 5th woman to be so honoured with the highest rank in legal practice. A woman of great intellect, she was appointed Notary Public in 1986 and voted as the Most Outstanding Female Legal Practitioner of the Year 2007 by Financial Standard Newspaper and Women Entrepreneurs African Network. She is a member of the Body of Benchers since 1999 and was privileged to become a Life Bencher in March 2007.

FG to Set up Special Court to Try Pipeline Vandals, Power Station Saboteurs

280513L.Power-Station.jpg-280513L.Power-Station.jpg
The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Public Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe, yesterday disclosed the decision of the federal government to set up a special court to try pipeline vandals in the country.
Okupe, who disclosed this at the end of a one-day summit for all State Publicity Secretaries of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital, said the establishment of the special court to facilitate quick prosecution of vandals and saboteurs would also be backed by a decision for troop deployment to areas prone to pipeline vandalism.
Okupe said though the repairs on the vandalised and blown gas pipelines had commenced throughout the country in order to restore regular supply to the existing power plants and raise the power generated up to the targeted 7,000 mega watts, the war against vandals and saboteurs would be executed in line with the ongoing security action against insurgency and terrorism in some parts of the nation.
According to him: "These people have resolved to continue to play a dangerous political game. They know that all things being equal, President Jonathan will deliver on the promise of regular power supply, and once he does that, the people will vote him into office for second term. Those who are unrelenting at querying the capability of the president to deliver have resolved to sabotage the effort and destroy the Nigerian dream."
"When I spoke with the Managing Director of the Niger Delta Power Holding Company, James Olotu and was told that inaugurating or not, the power plants are not operational due to lack of gas supply. The $16billion project lies in waste due to lack of gas supply.
“They want to kill the Nigerian dream and this is why the president has not been able to deliver on his promise. If the saboteurs had allow the transformation plan to be operational, we would have hit the target of generating over 300 per cent of what was generated in the past. In all these, they are not only aiming at the President but trying to kill the dream of regular power supply to the people."
He noted that the preliminary investigation conducted by the federal government had shown that the saboteurs, suspected to be members of opposition political parties and groups, are ready to lay their lives down to frustrate the transformation agenda of President Goodluck Jonathan in the power sector.

Okupe however, announced that the security action planned against vandals and saboteurs may last between six and eight weeks.
"This period will be the lowest for the nation in terms of power generation. When the battle is started and the repairs completed, more power projects will become operational and power supply will improve."

On the proposed conversion of Liquefied Natural Gas for domestic use and power generation, Okupe, said the management of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) had commenced arrangement for the domestication of the LNG with the proposed building of conversion plants close to the existing NIPP plants.

Tuesday, 1 April 2014

Civil Servant Files For Divorce Because His Wife Is HIV Positive

A 38-year-old civil servant, Silas Dodo, has prayed an Upper Area Court in Mararraba, Nasarawa State,  to dissolve his marriage with his wife because she is HIV-positive.
Dodo, who lives at Masaka, Nasarawa State, told the court on Tuesday that he wanted to divorce his 35-year-old wife, he married in 2007.


He told the court that his wife was found to be HIV-positive following a recent test they had.
Dodo also told the court that he met his wife in 2002 at the Federal University of Technology, Yola, and they married in 2007 in a church.


He said both he and his wife were screened on the church’s directive for HIV before their wedding, and the result indicated they were HIV-negative.
According to him, not too long after their marriage, his sexual relationship with his wife deteriorated as she started denying him of sex.


The complainant said his wife was always falling sick, a condition that compelled him to take her to several health centres for test where she was found to be HIV-positive.
He said when he found that she was HIV-positive he instructed his lawyer to write her and his church.


Dodo told the court his wife later packed out of their matrimonial home in Masaka and went to live on her own at Auta Balaifi.
He tendered the result of the various tests on his wife to buttress his claim.
In her response the woman, who was not represented by a counsel, admitted that the HIV test results tendered by her husband were genuine.


Counsel to the complainant, Mr Elisah Onaji, therefore urged the court to adjourn the case to another date.

The presiding officer, Mr Vincent Gwahemba, adjourned the matter till March 31 for continuation of hearing..